By Andrew Gum
Since its introduction to the global stage, the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) system has been one of the most controversial additions to the world of football. From correcting crucial mistakes, to sparking heated debates among fans and pundits, VAR has undeniably changed how the beautiful game is officiated.
What is VAR?
VAR is a technology designed to assist referees in making more accurate decisions during matches. It allows for the review of key incidents using video footage to minimise errors that could impact the outcome of a game.
The 2018 FIFA World Cup in Russia marked a pivotal moment, as it was the first high-profile tournament to implement VAR. Developed by the Royal Netherlands Football Association (KNVB), the technology was gradually adopted by leagues worldwide before its prominent use at the World Cup.
During the tournament, VAR reviewed critical moments, including goals, penalties, red cards, and cases of mistaken identity. A team of officials monitored each match from a video operation room, providing referees the opportunity to correct “clear and obvious” mistakes through replays and pitch-side monitors. This innovation promised to significantly reduce the errors that have historically influenced match outcomes.
The English premiere league adopted VAR in the 2019/20 season after watching carefully and analysing its impact in the 2018 world cup.
Criticisms of VAR
Notable analysts like Jamie Carragher, Peter Walton, and Gary Lineker have raised concerns about VAR’s impact, particularly during the 2018 World Cup final between France and Croatia.
In a pivotal moment, VAR awarded a penalty to France after a corner kick struck Croatian player Ivan Perišić’s arm in the penalty area. Initially, referee Néstor Pitana allowed play to continue, but after reviewing the incident via VAR, he changed his decision, leading to Antoine Griezmann converting the penalty and putting France ahead 2-1.
This decision ignited fierce debate. Critics argued that the penalty was excessive, noting that Perišić’s arm was in a natural position and the contact unintentional. They contended that such marginal calls should not decide a World Cup final, suggesting that VAR undermined the spirit of the game. Conversely, supporters maintained that the rules justified the penalty, arguing that any arm movement making the body unnaturally larger can warrant a foul.
Additionally, VAR has faced criticism for its inconsistency. Despite video reviews, similar incidents have been judged differently in various matches, leading to frustration among fans who expect standardized decision-making.
In a recent Premier League clash between Liverpool FC and Chelsea FC, VAR’s handling of key incidents drew scrutiny. Critics contended that a challenge involving Liverpool defender Trent Alexander-Arnold against Chelsea forward Jadon Sancho should have resulted in a penalty for Chelsea, but VAR chose not to award one. Instead, VAR awarded Liverpool a penalty following a challenge on Curtis Jones by Chelsea goalkeeper Robert Sánchez, further highlighting VAR’s inconsistency in crucial decisions.
Games VAR queried in
Chelsea vs. Ajax UEFA Champions League 2019. During a dramatic 4-4 draw, VAR’s intervention led to the sending off of two Ajax players for a handball and a foul, significantly altering the game’s momentum and allowing Chelsea to recover.
Liverpool vs. Shrewsbury Town in FA Cup 2020. VAR ruled out an equaliser for Shrewsbury Town due to offside, ensuring Liverpool’s progression in the competition but raising questions about the technology’s impact on lower-league clubs.
Argentina vs. Brazil in Copa America July 2021. VAR recommended a review for a tackle by Argentina’s Nicolas Otamendi on Richarlison, resulting in a yellow card rather than a red. This decision was controversial, with many believing it could have changed the match’s outcome.
Has VAR been successful?
Yes, VAR has improved accuracy in decision-making by reducing refereeing errors in critical situations. It has enhanced fairness by rigorously reviewing incidents like offside goals and unawarded penalties, impacting tight matches such as Liverpool vs. Shrewsbury Town in the FA Cup. VAR has helped standardise the application of rules, but faces criticism for inconsistency in decisions across matches and delays that disrupt game flow. Despite offering a second look, it remains subjective, with disputes over interpretations of incidents persisting, as seen in the 2021 Copa America semi-final.
Is VAR here to stay?
Ultimately, VAR represents the tension between tradition and innovation, the unpredictability of football and the pursuit of a more equitable playing field. As VAR continues to evolve, it is clear that it will remain a part of football’s future, even as the sport seeks to balance progress with its timeless appeal.
A lasting impact on the beautiful game
Since its World Cup debut, VAR has become a staple in top leagues like the English Premier League, Serie A, and the UEFA Champions League. Despite its challenges, many competitions have embraced it as a necessary evolution in modern football. VAR has changed how fans experience the game, with each goal and significant incident now subjected to scrutiny, knowing VAR might intervene.
Yet, the debate continues. As technology evolves and officials gain more experience with its application, the hope is that VAR will strike a balance between correcting mistakes and preserving the spontaneity that makes football so beloved.
